ساختار عاملی تأییدی و ویژگی های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامة چندبُعدی اشتیاق دانشجویان (SES)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدة روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دکتری روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکدة علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

4 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد جامعه‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، همدان، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی ساختار عاملی و ویژگی­های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامة چندبعدی اشتیاق دانشجویان بوده است. جامعة آماری پژوهش را همة دانشجویان 18 تا 30 سالة دانشگاه رازی در نیم­سال اول سال تحصیلی 1395-96 تشکیل دادند. نمونة پژوهش 230 نفر از دانشجویان بود که به روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی طبقه­ای انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامة چندبعدی اشتیاق دانشجویان، خودکارآمدی، مقیاس خودتنظیمی و عملکرد تحصیلی و مقیاس اهمال­کاری تحصیلی (برای بررسی روایی همزمان) پاسخ دادند. پایایی از طریق محاسبة ضریب آلفای کرونباخ بررسی شد. برای تحلیل داده­ها از روش تحلیل عاملی و همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد پرسشنامه از شش عامل اشباع‌شده و از شاخص­های برازش مناسبی برخوردار است. بین اشتیاق دانشجویان با خودکارآمدی هیجانی، اجتماعی، تحصیلی و خودتنظیمی تحصیلی رابطة مثبت و معنا­داری به دست آمد. همچنین، بین اشتیاق دانشجویان و اهمال­کاری تحصیلی رابطة منفی برقرار است. در تحلیل عاملی تأییدی 48 گویه تأیید شد. نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة چندبعدی اشتیاق دانشجویان در جامعة دانشجویان، خصوصیات روان‌سنجیِ قابل‌قبولی دارد و می­توان آن را به‌عنوان ابزاری معتبر در پژوهش­های روان‌شناختی به‌کار گرفت. پژوهش حاضر شواهد نویدبخشی را دربارة قابلیت کاربرد نسخة فارسی پرسشنامة چندبعدی اشتیاق دانشجویان در جمعیت دانشجویی فراهم کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


گال، مردیت، بورگ، والتر، و گال، جویس (1996). روش­های تحقیق کمّی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی. ترجمۀ احمدرضا نصر اصفهانی و همکاران، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
مؤمنی، خدامراد، عباسی، مسلم، پیرانی، ذبیح، و بگیان­کوله­مرز، محمدجواد (1395). نقش هیجان‌پذیری و جوّ عاطفی خانواده در پیش­بینی اشتیاق تحصیلی دانش­آموزان. دوفصلنامة راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری، 5(8)، 180-160.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40 (5), 518–529.
Bensimon, E. M. (2007). The Underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 441–469.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.
Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Buffalo, NY: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 362-322).
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The why’s of class size: student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 321–368.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.
Goodenow, C. (1992). School motivation, engagement, and sense of belonging among urban adolescent students. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
Grolnick. W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890-8908.
Gunuc, S. (2013). Determining the role of technology in student engagement and examining of the relationships between student engagement and technology use in class. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Anadolu University, Turkey.
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, K. (2015). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610.
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192.
Harper, S. R., & Quaye, S. J. (2009). Student engagement in higher education. New York: Routledge.
Hausmann, L., Schofield, J., & Woods, R. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White First-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.
Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 133–153.
Jamieson, P. (2003). Designing more effective on-campus teaching and learning spaces: A role for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1–2), 119–133.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–27.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.
Kember, D., Lee, K., & Li, N. (2001). Cultivating a sense of belonging in part-time students. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(4), 326–341.
Khoroushi, P., Nili, M. R., & Abedi, A. (2014). Relationship between cognitive and emotional engagement of learning and self-efficiency of students; Farhangian University of Isfahan. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 7(4), 229-234.
Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A Guide to Producing Research that matters. New York: Guilford.
Krause, K. L. (2005). Engaged, Inert or Otherwise Occupied? Deconstructing the Twenty-first Century Undergraduate Student. Paper presented at Symposium, Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students, James Cook University, Townsville, September.
Krause, K., & H. Coates. (2008).Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505.
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(3), 10-17.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.
Lewis, A. D. (2010). Facilitating student engagement: The importance of life satisfaction. Doctoral Dissertation, South Carolina University.
Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 801–815.
McInnis, C. (2005). Reinventing student engagement and the learning community: Strategic directions for policy research and practice. HEA Conference, Edinburgh.
Merwin, J. C. (1969). Historical review of changing concepts of evaluation. In Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Methods. The Sixty-eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, edited by R. L. Tyler. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Assessment, 23(3), 145-149.
Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.
Pace, C. R. (1982). Achievement and the quality of student effort. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California.
Park, S. Y. (2005). Student engagement and classroom variables in improving mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 87–97.
Pascarella, E. T. (1985). Students’ affective development within the college environment. The Journal of Higher Education, 56(6), 640–663.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.
Shochet, M. L., Smyth, T., & Homel, R (2013). The impact of parental attachment on adolescent perception of the school environment and school connectedness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 109-118.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1989). Academic procrastination Frequency and cognitive behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503- 209.
Sutherland, S. D. (2010). Student and teacher perceptions of student engagement. Doctoral Dissertation, Toronto University.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student Retention. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 8(1), 1–19.
Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. York: Higher Education Academy.
Voelkl, K. E. (1996). Measuring students’ identification with school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 760–770.
Walker, C., Greene, B., & Mansell, R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/ extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning& Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12.
Wang, M, T., Chow, A., Hofkens, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57–65.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents' perceptions of classroom environment, school engagement, and academic achievement. American Educational Research, 47(3), 633-662.