Investigating the Issues and Challenges of Implementing the English Language Teaching Curriculum in Rural Schools of Hormozgan Province and Providing Solutions to Improve the Quality of the Educational Process: A Phenomenological Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL), Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the issues and challenges of implementing English language teaching curriculum in the rural schools of Hormozgan province and to provide solutions to improve the quality of this process. For this purpose, Kaplan and Baldauf's (1997, 2003) foreign language education policy framework, which includes seven policies: access, human resources, curriculum, materials and methods, society, budget and evaluation, was used. To conduct the study, the phenomenological approach, which examines the lived experience of the participants to determine and explain the themes, had been applied. The participants were eight language teachers with teaching experience in rural areas and two ELT university instructors who were purposefully selected because of their experience in conducting research studies on curriculum planning. Data were obtained through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using the stages of hermeneutic phenomenology cycle and content analysis technique. The findings of the research showed that the implementation of the ELT curriculum in public schools, in general, and rural schools, in particular, has faced critical challenges which have rendered the program somewhat fruitless ; therefore, some practical solutions were suggested to improve the quality of ELT teaching and learning process in these areas.

Keywords


Aghagolzadeh, F., & Davari, H. (2017). English education in Iran: From ambivalent policies to paradoxical practices. In R. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 47-62). Amsterdam: Springer.
Alavi Moghadam, S., B., & Kheirabadi, R. (2013). Foreign language education policies in the national curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Roshd Language Education, 107, 14-16. [In Persian]
Atai, M. R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24 (3), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
Bagherabadi, M. G., & Mazdayasna, G. (2021). A Critical micro evaluation of the English language program reforms in State schools: A language-in-education policy and planning study. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics24(1), 103-140.
Barabadi, E., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). The emergence of various contradictions in Iranian high school English education under the new CLT-based curriculum. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2016.3872
Bonyadi, A. (2023). Phenomenology as a research methodology in teaching English as a foreign language. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00184-z
Chamani, F. (2023). Alternative futures of English language education in Iran in the era of globalization. Linguistics and Education73, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101146
Davari, H. & Aghagolzadeh, F. (2015). To teach or not to teach? Still an open question for the Iranian education system. In C. Kennedy (Ed.), English language teaching in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Innovations, trends and challenges (pp. 10-19). London: British Council.
Davari, H., Iranmehr, A., Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., & Nourzadeh, S. (2020). A critical evaluation of the new English language program in the national system from the perspective of ELT curriculum specialists: The language-in-education policy and planning framework. Language Related Research, 11(4), 669-703. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23223081.1399.11.4.13.8
Gholaminejad, R., & Raeisi-Vanani, A. (2021). English language teaching in Iranian mainstream schools: Pedagogical, societal and government policy environments. Issues in Educational Research31(1), 111-129. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.748915031941623
Haghani, N., & Ghodoosi, S. E. (2019). Foreign language policy and planning specifications of Iran based on Hornberger’s integrative framework. Critical Language and Literature Studies, 16(22), 37-58. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.29252/clls.16.22.37 [In Persian]
Iranmehr, A., Atai, M.R., & Babaii, E. (2018). Evaluation of EAP programs in Iran: Document analysis and expert perspectives. Applied Research on English Language, 7(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2018.104481.1123
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (1997). Language planning: From practice to theory. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (2003). Language and language-in education planning in the Pacific Basin. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, Jr. R. B. (2005). Language-in-education policy and planning. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 1037-1058). New York, NY: Routledge.
Langdridge, D., (2008). Phenomenology and critical social psychology: Directions and debates in theory and research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1126-1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00114.x
Laverty, S. M., (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00114.x
Lueger, M., & Vettori, O. (2014). Finding meaning in higher education: A social hermeneutics approach to higher education research, in Huisman, J. & Tight, M. (Eds.) Theory and method in higher education research II. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Merriam, S. B., (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from "Case study research in education." San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers
Mirhosseini, S.A., & Khodakarami, S. (2016). Aspects of ‘English language education ‘policies in Iran: ‘Our own beliefs’ or ‘out of who you are’? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11(3), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2016.1217870
Morady Moghadam, M., & Murray, N. (2019). English language teaching in Iran: A case of shifting sands, ambiguity, and incoherent policy and practice. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 7(1), 96-105.
Payne, M., & Almansour, M. (2014). Foreign language planning in Saudi Arabia: Beyond English. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.915461
Rasti, A. (2018). Iranian EFL teachers’ sense-making of policy reforms: The case of the new communicative-based curriculum. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 37(2), 169-193. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2019.30819.2580
Riazi, A. (2005). The four language stages in the history of Iran. In A. M. Y. Lin & P.W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonization, globalization: Language in-education policy and practice (pp. 98-114). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sadeghi, K & Richards, J. C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(4), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1080714
Tajeddin, Z., & Chamani, F. (2020). Foreign language education policy (FLEP) in Iran: Unpacking state mandates in major national policy documents. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills)39(3.1), 185-215. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2021.38870.2904
Tollefson, J. W. (2017). Language planning in education. In T. L. McCarty & S. May (Eds.), Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 17-29). New York, NY: Springer.
Zare, P., Anani Sarab, M. (2020). Language teachers’ perception of an ELT program: The case of Iranian English reform developed for secondary schools. Journal of Language Horizons, 4(2), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2020.30942.1285