Prediction of Academic Self-efficacy based on Attachment Styles and Meta-cognitive Skills of Students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Human Science, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Human Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Institute Law Enforcement and Social Study Naja, Tehran, Iran, Research center for cognitive and behavior sciences in police, Directorate of Health Rescue and treatment, Police Headquarter, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The study of academic self-efficacy and factors influencing it in today's society requires special attention for students. The aim of this study was predicting academic self-efficacy based on attachment styles and meta-cognitive skills. It was descriptive-correlational study and statistical samples (n=195) were selected by a cluster-random sampling method from third-grade high school female students of Ahar. Mac Elroy & Banting's academic self-efficacy questionnaire (2002), the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS, Collins & Read, 1990), and the metacognition questionnaire (O'Neil and Abedi, 1996) were employed for data gathering. Correlation analysis results showed a positive and significant relationship between the components of metacognitive skills and academic self-efficacy and the components of secure and insecure avoidance attachment, the relationship between the component of anxious attachment style with academic self-efficacy was negative (p <0.05). Regression analysis, the rate of influence of metacognitive awareness, cognitive strategy, planning, and self-monitoring components on academic self-efficacy was respectively 0.29, 0.28, 0.37, 0.11 (p <0.05). The rate of influence of attachment components (insecure avoidance), proximity (secure), and anxiety on academic self-efficacy were respectively 0.44, 0.24, -0.11, respectively (p <0.05). As with results, the self-efficacy of students can be promoted through significant systematizing the process of teaching-learning as well as anxiety-avoidance conditions.

Keywords


اعتمادی، عذرا، و سعادت، سجاد. (1394). نقش سلامت خانواده و سبک‌های دلبستگی در پیش‌بینی خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانشجویان. راهبرد آموزش، 8(4)، 201-195.
پاکدامن، شهلا (1380). بررسی ارتباط بین دلبستگی و جامعهطلبی در نوجوانان. رسالة دکتری روان‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران.
جلالی، داریوش  (1388). اثربخشی پیشگیری سرویس پیام کوتاه بر نگرش و خودکارآمدی دانش‌آموزان نسبت به گرایش مواد مخدر. فصلنامه فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در علوم تربیتی، 1(3)، 93-111.
صفرزاده، سحر، و مرعشیان، فاطمه سادات (1395). رابطة جهت‌گیری هدف و فراشناخت با خودکارآمدی تحصیلی در دانشجویان دختر. زن و فرهنگ، 8(28)، 36-23.
قلیپور، نسیم (1397). بررسی رابطة باورهای فراشناختی با خودکارآمدی، شادکامی و بهزیستی روان‌شناختی در دانش‌آموزان مدارس آموزش از راه دور. پیشرفتهای نوین در علوم رفتاری، 3(10)، 68-50.
مرزبان، شهربانو (1397). رابطة بین باورهای فراشناخت و باورهای خودکارآمدی با اضطراب امتحان و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. آفاق علوم انسانی، 20، 108-85.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an genetic perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 52(10), 1-26.
Boström, L., & Lassen, L. M. (2006). Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and meta-cognition. Education Training, 48(2/3), 178-189.
Bowlby, I. (1976). Attachment and loss. Vol. III. Separation, anxiety, anger. The Hogarth and institute of psych analysis.
Boyer, B. A., & Paharia, M. I. (2008). Comprehensive handbook of clinical health psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Brown, G. T., Peterson. E.R., Yao, E. S. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: Impact on self-regulation, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology. 86(4),606-629.
 Burke, J. (2009). Reading, Reminders: tools, tips, and techniques. Boynton Cook.
Cassidy, J., &Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of Attachment, The Guilford press, New York London (pp. 23-811).
Collins,V. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment؛ Working models a relationship quality in dating couples. Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 46-63.
Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 243-257.
 Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
 Karademas, E.C., Kalantzi-Azizi, K.  (2004). The stress process, self- efficacy expectations, and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(5), 1033-1043.
Kay, J. (1992). Student evaluation in cooperative learning. Teacher cognitions, Teachers and Teaching, 14(5), 463-477.
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. (2009). College students’ homework and academic
achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and
Learning
, 4, 97–110.
Larkin, S. (2009). Metacognition in young children. London: Routledge.
Maddux, J. E. (2009). The power of believing you can. Hand book of positive psychology Oxford University Press, Indian Streems.
Mahler, M. S., Furer, W. (1963). Certain aspects of the separation-individuation phase. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 32 (1), 1-14.
Montague, C. (1992). The multiple dimension of learning 3rd Ed. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 Nachmias, M.,  Gunnar, M., Mangelsdorf, S.,  Parritz, R.H.,  Buss, K. (1996). Behavioral inhibition and stress reactivity. The moderating role of attachment security. Child Development, 67(22), 508- 522.
Oneil, H., Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of state meta-cognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Educational Research, 89(4),234-245
Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (4), 406-492.
Paris, S. G., & Winograde. P. (2016). The role of self- regulation learning in contextual teaching: Principle and practice for preparation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 10, 748-778.
Phan, H., & Walker. R. (2000). The Predicting and Mediational Role of Mathematics Self-efficacy: APath Analysis. AARE annual conference Sydney. 
Schewarzer, R., & Scholz, U. (2000). Cross-cultural assessment of coping resources: the
general perceived self-efficacy scale. Paper presented at the Asian Congress of
HealthPsychology. Health psychology and culture
, Tokyo, Japan.
Vedøy, I. B., Anderssen, S. A., Tjomsland, H, E., Skulberg, K, R., & Thurston, M. (2020).
Veenman, M. V. J., Vanhout, A. M., & Afflerbach, A. (2006). Metacognition and learning conceptual and methodological consideration. Metacognition Learning. 10(2),103-140.
 Wright, S. L., Perrone-McGovern, K. M., Boo, J. N., & White, A. V. (2014). Influential factors in academic and career self‐efficacy: Attachment, supports, and career barriers. Counseling Development, 92(1), 36-46.