A Three-layer Pattern for Feasibility and Establishment of Life School by Meta-synthesis Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student in Administration Education, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabili, Iran

Abstract

In today's world, education is one of the most important and effective organizations for personal and social development of human beings. Life School that sometimes referred to as the "school for life", has the mission of achieving the all-encompassing and holistic goals of education. The purpose of this study was to provide A Three-layer Pattern for Feasibility and Establishment of Life School by Meta-Synthesis Method. The statistical population includes previous research (articles, projects and dissertations) in the field of life school, which was selected as a statistical sample with the purposeful approach of the most relevant studies. In order to determine the importance and priority of the extracted codes, Shannon quantitative entropy method was used. The research findings were identified and categorized into 5 categories, 22 concepts and 98 codes, which are 5 main categorie: Identify pedagogy, infrastructure, organizational culture and climate, human resources and effective social communication. after the research steps, the model of determining and effectively establishing the Life school in three layers of feasibility, conceptual design and implementation structure and establishment of Life school is presented. In the feasibility stage, the acceptance of the model, determining the prerequisites and analyzing the current situation and the gap until the implementation of the new plan is measured. In the design phase, the identification of pedagogy is considered, and determining the type of learning and the purpose of learning is the basis of any action. In the phase of establishing infrastructure, organizational culture and atmosphere, human resources and effective social communication with comprehensive management are implemented.

Keywords

References

ادیب، منصور (1391). مدرسة زندگی، درگیر برنامه و روش‌ها. تعلیم ‌و تربیت، 28(3)، 164-133.
آذر، عادل، میرفخرالدینی، سیدحیدر، و انواری رستمی، علی‌اصغر (1387). بررسی مقایسه‌ای تحلیل داده‌ها در شش سیگما، با کمک ابزارهای آماری و فنون تصمیم‌گیری چندشاخصه. مدرس علوم انسانی، 59، 36-1.
حیدری فرد، رضا، زین‌آبادی، حسن‌رضا، بهرنگی، محمدرضا، و عبداللهی، بیژن (1396). ایجاد ساختار توانمندساز و حامی نوآوری لازمة تحقق مدارس نوآور پژوهشی ترکیبی. مدیریت بر آموزش سازما‌‌‌ن‌ها، 6، 151-115.
حیدری‌فرد، رضا، زین‌آبادی، حسن‌رضا، بهرنگی، محمدرضا، و عبداللهی، بیژن (1395). فرهنگ و جو سازمانی نوآورانة مدرسه یک پژوهش کیفی. رهیافتی نو در مدیریت آموزشی، 7(2)، 74-53.
سهرابی، بابک، اعظمی، امیر، و یزدانی، حمید (1390). آسیب‌شناسی پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده در زمینة مدیریت اسلامی با رویکرد فراترکیب. چشم‌انداز مدیریت دولتی، 6، 24-9.
فتحی واجارگاه، کوروش، کشاورز، سوسن، تاجیک اسمعیلی، عزیزالله، خسروی، علی‌اکبر، دیبا واجاری، طلعت، پورصادقی، حبیب‌اله؛ رحمتی، مریم، و زندیه، گیتا (1392). مدرسة زندگی باید در پی تربیت کدام شهروند مطلوب باشد؟. مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی، 6(11)، 44-9.
فرح‌بخش، سعید، ستار، آزیتا، و محمدی، طاهره (1394). بررسی عوامل مؤثر در استقرار مدرسة زندگی در مدارس ابتدایی شهر خرم‌آباد. مدیریت مدرسه، 4(1)، 85-71.
کریمی، عبدالعظیم (1390). همانند‌ی‌های مدرسة زندگی با زندگی مدرسه‌ای. تعلیم ‌و تربیت، 111، 131- 105.
ماهروزاده، طیبه، و عباسی، منصوره (1391). مدرسة زندگی، ماهیت و چگونگی تحقق آن. اندیشه‌های نوین تربیتی، 8(1)، 170-147.
Aldridge, J. M., McChesney, K., & Afari, E. (2018). Relationships between school climate, bullying and delinquent behaviors. Learning Environments Research, 21(2), 153–172.
Ayık, A., & Ataş-Akdemir, Ö. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının okul yaşam kalitesi ve okula yabancılaşma algıları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 21(4), 429- 452.
Bokhorst, C. L., Sumter, S. R., & Westenberg, P. (2010). Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: Who is perceived as most supportive?. Social Development,19, 417–426.
Carlson, A., & Palmer, Ch. (2016). A qualitative meta-ynthesis of the benefits of ecolabeling in developing countries. Ecological Economics. 127, 129-145.
Casas, F., Bălţătescu, S., Bertran, I., Gonzglez, S., & Hatos, A. (2013). School satisfaction among adolescents: Testing different indicators for its measurement and its relationship with overall life satisfaction and subjective well-being in Romania and Spain. Social Indicators Research,111, 665–681.
Danby, G., & Hamilton, P. (2016). Addressing the ‘elephant in the room’. The role of the primary school practitioner in supporting children’s mental well-being. Pastoral Care in Education, 34, 90–103.
Gorodetsky, M., & Barak, J. (2008). The educational- cultural edge: A participative Learning environment for co-emergence of personal and institutional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1907-1918.
Goswami, H. (2012). Social relationships and children’s subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research,107, 575–588.
Kangas, M. (2010). Finnish children’s views on the ideal school and learning environment. Learning Environments Research,13, 205–223.
Kaya, A., & Sezgin, M. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin mutluluklarının eğitim stresi ve okul yaşam kalitesi tarafından yordanması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(41), 245-264.
Kurt, L. J. (2017). Creating school climates that foster inclusive community attitudes toward gender nonconforming students. School Counseling,15(1), 1–25.
Lawler, M. J., Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., & Roh, S. (2015). Ecological, relationship-based model of 12-yearold children’s subjective well-being in the United States and ten other countries. Social Research and Policy,6(2), 1–14.
Lawler, M. J., Newland, L. A., Giger, J. T., Roh, S., & Brockevelt, B. (2017). Ecological, relationship-based model of children’s subjective well-being: Perspectives of 10-year-old children in the United States and ten other countries. Child Indicators Research,10, 1–18.
McAuley, C., McKeown, C., & Merriman, B. (2012). Spending time with family and friends: Children’s views on relationships and shared activities. Child Indicators Research,5, 449–467.
Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Life satisfaction in early adolescence: Personal, neighborhood, school, family, and peer influences. Youth and Adolescence,40, 889–901.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a Meta synthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women. Research in Nursing & Health, 26(2), 153-170.
Simmons, C., Graham, A., & Thomas, N. (2015). Imagining an ideal school for wellbeing: Locating student voice. Educational Change,16, 129–144.
Smith, P. R. (2013). Psychosocial learning environments and the mediating effect of personal meaning upon satisfaction with education. Learning Environments Research,16, 259–280.
Zimmer L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Advanced Nursing, 53 (3), 311-318.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics