Designing the Pattern of the Accrediting the International Standards of the Evaluation System in Farhangian University

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran

2 Department of Educational Sciences, Bardaskan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bardaskan, Iran

3 Department of Educational Sciences, Sabzevar Branch, Farhangian University, Sabzevar, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to design a model for accrediting the international standards of the Farhangian University evaluation system accomplished through the mixed-methods procedure (qualitative and quantitative) and exploratory design. The statistical population of the study consisted of two groups. In the qualitative phase of the study, professors and experts familiar with the field of accreditation of the validation system, and in the quantitative phase, all faculty members and adjunct professors in the Farhangian Universtity of Razavi, North, and South Khorasan Provinces participated including 741 participants. In the qualitative phase, 18 scientific experts were selected through judgmental purposive sampling and based on the saturation principle. In the quantitative phase, 256 participants (based on the Morgan table) were selected by stratified random sampling to answer the questionnaire. To collect the data in the qualitative phase, this study used the structured and semi-structured interview and in the quantitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. The present study used the grounded theory methodology to analyze the qualitative data, and the analysis of variance and covariance to analyze the quantitative phase. KMO and Bartlett’s test was used for sample adequacy test and correlation. Furthermore, the model was designed using structural equation modeling. The result of the quantitative phase showed that all fit indices used in this model have a very convenient fit. The most significant factors in accrediting the international standards of the evaluation system in Farhangian University were identified as “setting goals in comparison with the optimal patterns in order to achieve the desired set of results”, making sure employees have a healthy and transcendent work environment align with the social responsibilities”, and “the extent to which the mission and goals are specified”

Keywords


اساسنامة دانشگاه فرهنگیان (1390).
بازرگان، عباس (1394). استانداردهایآموزشعالی: ازآرمانتاواقعیت. آموزشعالی، 8(30)، 23- 11.
دارابی، مجید، نارنجکار، جمشید، فرمهینی فراهانی، محسن، گرشاسبی، احیاء، و یوسفی، ایران (1391). ارزیابی عملکرد دانشکدة پزشکی دانشگاه شاهد بر اساس مرحلة اول الگوی اعتبارسنجی. توسعة آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 5(8)، 36-8.
رحمانپور،محمد، یعقوبی، سلام، احمدی، سهرکاو، و زمانی، بی‌بی عشرت (1393). بررسی شاخص‌های اعتبارسنجی نظام‌های آموزش عالی: با تأکید بر رتبه­بندی آن‌ها. آموزش عالی، 7(26)، 47-11.
عباسی، محمد رضا؛ و شیره‌پزآرانی، علی اصغر.(1390). سیاستگذاری کیفیت آموزش عالی: چالش­ها و چشم­اندازها. پنجمین همایش ارزیابی کیفیت در نظام دانشگاهی، تهران، دانشگاه تهران- پردیس دانشکده­های فنی.
مجتبی­زاده، محمد، عباسپور، عباس، ملکی، حسن، و فراست‌خواه، مقصود (1397). الگوی اعتبارسنجی و تضمین کیفیت نظام آموزش عالی ایران از دیدگاه خبرگان. پژوهش در نظام های آموزشی، 12(42)، 24-7.
محمدی، آیین، مجتهدزاده، ریتا، اسدزندی، شادی، و استاد، ناصر (1397). طراحی و استقرار سیستم ملی اعتباربخشی و ارزشیابی مرا کز آموزش مجازی دانشگاه های علوم پزشکی کشور. ویژه­نامة دستاوردهای چهل‌سالة نظام آموزش عالی، 27(4)، 270- 260.
مشایخ، فریده (1391). دیدگاه­های نو در برنامه­ریزی آموزشی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها(سمت).
American Psychological Association. (2018). Definition of accreditation. Retrieved May 31, 2018, from http://search.apa.org/search?query=definition%20of% 20accreditation
Buonaura,C., Calandra, N., Primiano, D. (2012). An approach to accreditation: The path of the italian higher education. CNVSU in University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Italy.
Chaiyaphumthanachok, C., Tangdhanakanond, K., & Sujiva, S. (2016).Indicators development for accreditation of teacher educationprograms in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,217, 430-434.
Council for Higher Education Accreditation (2018). Information aboat accreditation. Retrieved February 1, 2018, from http://www.chea.org/public_ info/index.asp
Cret, B. (2012). Accreditations as local management tools. High Education, 61, 415-429.
Everest College (2018). How our accreditation benefits you. Retrieved February 3, 2018, from http://www.everestonline.edu/accreditation.
Grifoll, J. (2016). External quality assurance agencies and excellence inhigher education. Educación Médica, 17(3), 94-96.
Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Questions abound as the college-rankings race goes global Chronicle of Higher Education, March 13. http://chronicle. com/article/Questions-Abound-as-the/126699/.
Kumar Shamra, D., & Kumar P. (2016). Quality Control Indicators inTeacher Education. IJEAR, 6(1), 129-131.