Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science. Science & Education, 8, 1–12.
Azninda, R. H., & Sunarti, T. (2021). Teachers’ Views about Nature of Science (NOS) Using Reconceptualised Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science (RFN) Questionnaire. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012019
Afnan, R., Munasir, M., Budiyanto, M., & Aulia, M. I. R. (2023). The Role of Scientific Literacy Instruments For Measuring Science Problem Solving Ability. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(1), 45-58.
Aiman, U., & Amelia Ramadhaniyah Ahmad, R. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Pbl) Terhadap Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar.
Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, 1(1), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v1i1.195
Alatas, F., & Fauziah, L. (2020). Model problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi sains pada konsep pemanasan global.
JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 4(2), 102.
https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v4i2.862
Al Sultan, A., Henson Jr, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327.
Anggreni, L. D., Jampel, I. N., & Diputra, K. (2020). Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Berbantuan Penilaian Portofolio Terhadap Literasi Sains.
Mimbar Ilmu, 25(1), 41.
https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i1.24475
Aragão, S. B. C., Marcondes, M. E. R., & Khan, S. M. B. A. (2018). Fundamentals of scientific literacy: a proposal for science teacher education program. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 9(4), 3037-3045.
Basiri, N., Ahmadi, F., & Nikamal, M. (2021). Assessment of students' understanding of the concept of science and scientific inquiry and its relation to understanding a physical concept (mass). Educational Technology (Technology and Education), 15(3), 519–530. Retrieved from
https://sid.ir/paper/376319/fa [In Persian]
Bayir, E., Cakici, Y., & Ertas, O. (2014). Exploring natural and social scientists’ views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1286–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.860496
Benjamin, T. E., Marks, B., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Rose, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, A., & Muldrow, L. L. (2017). Development and validation of scientific literacy scale for college preparedness in STEM with freshmen from diverse institutions.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 607-623.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9710-x
Bell, R. L., Matkins, J. J., & Gansneder, B. M. (2011). Impacts of contextual and explicit instruction on preservice elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 414–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20402
Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1–5. https://www.joe.org/joe/2012april/tt2.php
Cesljarev, C., & Akerson, V. (2022). Integrated Assessments of K-12 Students’ Science and Literacy Knowledge.
International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(3), 471–485.
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2718
Clough, M. P. (2007, January). Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: Questions rather than tenets. The Pantaneto Forum, 25(1), 31–40.
Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2012). Impact of a nature of science and science education course on teachers’ nature of science classroom practices. In Advances in Nature of Science Research: Concepts and Methodologies (pp. 247–266).
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28, 205–248.
Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25, 147–164.
Demirel, Z. M., Sungur, S., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2023). Science Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Science and its Integration into Instruction. Science & Education, 32(5), 1401–1433.
Dogan, N., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112.
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erduran, S., Kaya, E., Cilekrenkli, A., Akgun, S., & Aksoz, B. (2020). Perceptions of nature of science emerging in group discussions: A comparative account of pre-service teachers from Turkey and England. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(7).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10110-9
Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared? An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113–1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20156
Irzik, G. (2010). Why should philosophers of science pay attention to the commercialization of academic science? In M. Suarez, M. Dorato, & M. Redei (Eds.), EPSA epistemology and methodology of science (pp. 129–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3263-8_11
Fragkiadaki, G., Fleer, M., & Rai, P. (2022). Science concept formation during infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood: Developing a scientific motive over time. Research in Science Education.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10053-
Jiao, W., Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2023). Contributions of the Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science in Science Education. Science & Education, 32(5), 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00355-0
Ju, H., Cho, E. H., & Paik, S. (2023). Impact of Teaching Materials Based on the Family Resemblance Approach on Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 9(1), 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10059
Justi, R. (2000). Teaching scientific models: Implications in the context of chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1007.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students' views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89(2), 314–334.
Kartal, E. E., Cobern, W. W., Dogan, N., Irez, S., Cakmakci, G., & Yalaki, Y. (2018). Improving science teachers’ nature of science views through an innovative continuing professional development program.
International Journal of STEM Education, 5(30), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0125-4
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Aksoz, B., & Akgun, S. (2019). Reconceptualized family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 21–47.
Kite, V., Park, S., McCance, K., & Seung, E. (2020). Secondary science teachers’ understandings of the epistemic nature of science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 243–264.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2020.1808757
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.
McComas, W. F. (2014). The language of science education: An expanded glossary of key terms and concepts in science teaching and learning. Sense Publishers.
Miller, J. D. (2020). The importance of early science education: Building a foundation for lifelong learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 555–567.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09876-9
Nur, E. M., & Fitnat, K. (2015). Explicit-reflective teaching nature of science as embedded within the science topic: Interactive historical vignettes technique. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 40–49.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.965
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratclife, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
Redhead, M. (1980). Models in physics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 31(2), 145–163.
Resnik, D. (2007). The price of truth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rahman, A., Santosa, T. A., Ilwandri, I., Suharyat, Y., Aprilisia, S., & Suhaimi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of AI Based Blended Learning on Student Scientific Literacy: Meta-analysis. LITERACY: International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 2(1), 141-150.
Sahin, E. A., & Deniz, H. (2016). Exploring elementary teachers’ perceptions about the developmental appropriateness and importance of nature of science aspects. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2673–2698.
Saka, M. (2023). Pre-service primary school teachers’ application of the features of the nature of science to socioscientific. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 14(2), 2059–2075.
Samara, N. (2015). Understanding of the ‘nature of science’ among undergraduate students at Mutah University in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, 11(8), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3768.7763
Suzuri-Hernandez, L. J. (2010). Exploring school students' views of the nature of science (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).
Shohib, M., Rahayu, Y. S., Wasis, W., & Hariyono, E. (2021). Scientific literacy ability of junior high school students on static electricity and electricity in living things.
IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(6), 700–708.
https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i6.170
Stylos, G., Siarka, O., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy.
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271-282.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12637
Suhaimi, Santosa, T. A., & Aprilisia, S. (2022). Analisis Pendekatan Saintifik Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Didika: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 92–101.
Suharyat, Y., Ichsan, I., Santosa, T. A., Aprilisia, S., & Yulianti, S. (2022). Meta-analysis study: The effectiveness of problem solving learning in science learning in Indonesia. International Journal of Education and Literature, 1(3), 06-13.
Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y. et al. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2
Wangchuk, S., Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Dorji, U. (2023). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Educational Innovation and Practice, 6.
Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Lhamo, S. (2019). Bhutanese in-service science teachers’ concept of the nature of science. Journal of Instructional Research, 8(2), 80–90.
Wilholt, T. (2009). Bias and values in scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 40, 92–101.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell.
Yalaki, Y., Doğan, N., İrez, S., Doğan, N., Çakmakçi, G., & Kara, B. E. (2019). Measuring nature of science views of middle school students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(3), 461–475.
Zaheri, M., Abdolmaleki, S., & Farjadmand, L. (2018). Investigating the understanding of pre-service science teachers about the nature of experimental science: A case study of teacher training centers in Tehran. Research in Curriculum Planning (Knowledge and Research in Educational Sciences - Curriculum Planning), 15(31), 79–94. Retrieved from
https://sid.ir/paper/127472/fa [In Persian]
Zulkifli, Z., Satria, E., Supriyadi, A., & Santosa, T. A. (2022). Meta-analysis : The effectiveness of the integrated STEM technology pedagogical content knowledge learning model on the 21st century skills of high school students in the science department. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 5(1), 32–42.
)